Seagull counting on land and from the air – inventory of Herring Gulls (Larus argentatus) and Lesser black-backed Gulls (L. fuscus) using drones and ground surveys on the Amrum Odde
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21248/corax.v26.63Abstract
A comparison of two breeding-bird census methods was carried out on Amrum for three breeding seasons (2017–2019). Herring Gulls and Lesser Black-backed Gulls were recorded using ‘Method C’ (pair count in non-visible colonies by counting adult birds flying up) and by drone. Both methods are suitable for monitoring the gull colonies and provide similar results in terms of the total number of breeding pairs with different advantages in terms of evaluation speed and species identification. When counting adult birds in flight (Method C), the number of birds and the very short time for counting make species differentiation more challenging. In addition, the method involves a significant disturbance. To minimise uncertainty and disturbance, a large group of people is required for the counts. Using a drone to record breeding birds yields more accurate numbers and at the same time minimises disturbance in the breeding colonies. Compared to method C, it is easier to differentiate between species, based on the drone imagery. The advantage of using drones depends on the target species and the vegetation. Additional inspections of the area may still be necessary. Since 2020, the large gulls breeding at Amrumer Odde in the north of the island have been counted only by drone. Analysing the images is currently still very time-consuming, which causes a time delay in the availability of numbers. The ongoing development of AI-supported programmes will reduce the processing time in the future. Another advantage of drone surveys is that in addition to recording breeding pairs, other relevant parameters, such as habitat elevation models, can be analysed in the context
of the spatial distribution of breeding birds.
Downloads
References
Barr, J. R., M. C. Green, S. J. DeMaso & T. B. Hardy 2020. Drone surveys do not increase colony-wide flight behaviour at waterbird nesting sites, but sensitivity varies among species. Scientific Reports 1. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-60543-z DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-60543-z
Corregidor-Castro, A., M. Riddervold, T. E. Holm & T. Bregnballe 2022. Monitoring colonies of large gulls using UAVs: From individuals to breeding pairs. Micromachines 13. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi13111844 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/mi13111844
Dierschke, V., V. Salewski, T. Bregnballe, J. Dierschke, B. Hälterlein, S. Martens & K. T. Pedersen 2021. Jährliche Überlebenswahrscheinlichkeiten
von Heringsmöwen Larus fuscus und Silbermöwen L. argentatus aus Schleswig-Holstein und Dänemark 2005–2014. Corax 24: 321–340.
Francis, R. J., M. B. Lyons, R. T. Kingsford & K. J. Brandis 2020. Counting mixed breeding aggregations of animal species using drones: Lessons from waterbirds on semi-automation. Remote Sensing 7. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12071185 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12071185
Gerlach, B., R. Dröschmeister, T. Langgemach, K. Borkenhagen, M. Busch, M. Hauswirth, T. Heinicke, J. Kamp, J. Karthäuser, C. König, N. Markones, N. Prior, S. Trautmann, J. Wahl & C. Sudfeldt 2019. Vögel in Deutschland – Übersichten zur Bestandssituation. DDA, BfN, LAG VSW, Münster.
Hälterlein, B., D. M. Fleet, H. R. Henneberg, T. Mennebäck, L. M. Rasmussen, P. Südbeck, O. Thorup & R. Vogel 1995. Anleitung zur Brutbestandserfassung von Küstenvögeln im Wattenmeerbereich. Wadden Ses Ecosystem No. 3, Common Wadden Sea Secretariat, Trilateral Monitoring and Assessment Group & Joint Monitoring Program for Breeding Birds in the Wadden Sea, Wilhelmshaven.
López, J. J. & M. Mulero-Pázmány 2019. Drones for conservation in protected areas: Present and future. Drones 3. https://doi.org/10.3390/drones3010010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/drones3010010
Niedersächsischer Landesbetrieb für Wasserwirtschaft, Küsten- und Naturschutz (NLWKN) (2017): Pressemitteilung „Baltrum: Neueste Technik zur Seevögelerfassung“. https://www.nlwkn.niedersachsen.de/startseite/aktuelles/presse_und_offentlichkeitsarbeit/pressemitteilungen/baltrum-neueste-technik-zur-seevoegelerfassung-154470.html (Abgerufen am 22.7.2024).
Rush, G. P., L. E. Clarke, M. Stone & M. J. Wood 2018. Can drones count gulls? Minimal disturbance and semiautomated image processing with an unmanned aerial vehicle for colony-nesting seabirds. Ecology and Evolution 8(24). https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.4495 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.4495
Schulze-Dieckhoff, M. 2022. Erfassung von Koloniebrütern mittels UAV in Niedersachsen am Beispiel der Lachmöwen- und Brandseeschwalbenkolonie Baltrum. 13. Deutsches See- und Küstenvogelkolloquium der AG Seevogelschutz, 11. bis 13. November 2022, Amrum.
Valle, R. & F. Scarton 2019. Drones improve effectiveness and reduce disturbance of censusing Common Redshanks Tringa totanus breeding on salt marshes. Ardea 107(3): 275-282. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5253/arde.v107i3.a3
Wich, S. A. & L. P. Koh 2018. Conservation drones: Mapping and monitoring biodiversity. Oxford University Press. Oxford. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198787617.001.0001
Zbyryt, A., C. Mitrus & G. Neubauer 2023. Productivity of the Great Egret (Ardea alba) and Grey Heron (A. cinerea) in mixed heronries in Poland and behavioral response of fledglings to a drone. Ornis Fennica 100(4): 144–158. DOI: https://doi.org/10.51812/of.119429


